Debates on the present state of C++ in the programming world divide the participants into two camps: some dislike C++ and predict it's imminent death, while others believe that it will persist as it has before. I'd say the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but that would mean that C++'s condition is kind of uncertain, like it was between the releases of C++03 and C++11. But it's not actually so. How so? Let's try to figure this out.
Nothing of the kind. Sure, C++ is probably not as popular as C# and Java among beginner programmers, and industry giants do not release new C++-specific technologies, nor is it promoted by Microsoft and Oracle. But interpreting this as the end of C++ is totally wrong. Software based on C++ is still in use and needs support. Most new software, such as game engines, are built with (/extensively uses) C++. C++11 and C++14, as well as C++17 which is coming out soon, only prove that C++ is doing well. But first things first.
As mentioned previously, C++ was in a somewhat "uncertain" condition between C++11 and C++03 releases. Old libraries such as boost, Qt, etc., were developing and improving a new library when C++/CLI was released, while there was still no sign of the new official standard.
Things went that way for a long time, but anyway the new C++11 standard was released in 2011 instead of 2009, as it had been planned. However, it was finally released and brought many additions, extensions, and syntactic sugar. It made the language much easier to code in; the standard library was expanded with many things to make the programming process easier. A lot of new features were introduced: official support of parallel programming, initialization lists to make the code clearer, lambda functions, and much more. But there is no need to discuss all of that here because the article is not about that.
OK, we have the C++11 standard, that's great. But what's next? Stagnation for another 8 years? No way. It is not a secret that C++14 has already been released. It is hard to compare C++11's and C++14's innovations (/It isn't as innovative as C++14), but it has still brought some additions and improvements.
It is very important that this trend is sustained, and that there are already some outlines of the new C++17 standard.
Of course, it will be a long time before programmers fully understand all the benefits of the new standards, and learn to use the innovations properly. Yet these innovations are sure to have a positive effect on the quality of the code and software.
And what about existing software?
There is a large amount of software built with C++. Of course, we need to support it. Do you want to look at real-life examples? Please, check this list. You will surely (I can bet) find many well-known products there. I don't believe that anyone will take up the job of rewriting all the existing C++ code into C# or Java just because it will be easier to work with in future, and because of the garbage collectors, and so on. It appears that knowledge of C++ is still urgent. Considering that C++ has become much more convenient to work with, the idea of using it to write modules/applications does not sound crazy. It will be much easier to support such code later. At the same time, it is the same high-performance C++as it used to be, but extended with a huge variety of new features. The extended standard library will also give us an opportunity to use ready-made solutions instead of creating them anew.
From this viewpoint, things are not so good with C++. It is not much popular among beginner programmers who prefer C# or Java instead. Why? There are several reasons:
Every programmer knows that C++ is difficult. Yes, it is vast, and there are a lot of peculiarities. But what do we get in return? High performance + absolute control of all the processes (especially in original C). Again, we cannot but mention the C++11 standard with its improved user-friendliness, easy syntax, various containers, algorithms, and other useful things designed to make programmers' life and job easier.
However, you still can shoot yourself in the foot, though the probability of this has been greatly reduced.
It is not a secret for anyone that C# and Java are aggressively promoted by Microsoft and Oracle. I am not sure about Java, for I'm not very much into the current trends there, but promotion by Microsoft is very evident. Most Microsoft innovations are tailored specifically for C# and their hackathons use C# too. I'm not saying it's bad, I'm just stating a fact.
There is no support like that for C++. Sure, there is a variety of tools released specifically for it to make the workflow and the development process easier. Among these, we should mention Qt and ReSharper C++ recently released by JetBrains. Visual Studio 2015 now provides support for some of the innovations of the latest standards plus some new additional features that have made the workflow easier.
Nevertheless, it can't compare to C#'s and Java's scope of promotion.
In spite of the fact that C++ is a very rich and flexible language, its scope of use is pretty narrow. Competitors contribute to this, too. Let's look at a real-life example - mobile software development. The major platforms are already occupied by specific languages: Windows Phone by C#, Android by Java, iOS by Objective-C. That doesn't mean that you can't use C++ for these platforms. The question is if it will be easy, and as efficient. Neither is C++ well suited for web software development, which is growing more and more popular every year. Yes, there are means to work with sockets and libraries like Wt. But have you heard much of C++ web applications? Me neither. Considering that mobile and web software development have become a very popular field, it's no wonder that beginner programmers prefer to learn other languages.
But it's all just words, and, as they say, a picture paints a thousand words.
Let's have a look at the current state of affairs. In this area, the TIOBE index is quite popular: it demonstrates language ratings, rating dynamics in the chart, and other parameters.
As you can see, C++ is in the 3rd place presently, which is better than the last year. Furthermore, it is one of two languages among the top five whose rating has increased, even though it is only slightly.
I think that you have already formed an opinion of C++'s current state in the modern world. Now let me speak my own.
Shouting that C++ is doing better than ever would be a lie. But an even bigger lie is to call it a "dying" language.
C++ is alive and occupying its own niche.
New standards introduce some innovations making the language easier and more "user-friendly". Software built with this language is still in use, and needs support. C++ is perfectly suited for software development in certain fields, which, together with everything said above, means that C++ is still needed, evolving, and not going to give up.
I'm going on to tell you about how programmers walk on thin ice without even noticing it. Let's speak on shift operators <<, >>. The working principles of the shift operators are evident and many programmers even don't know that using them according to the C/C++ standard might cause undefined or unspecified behavior.