V550. An odd precise comparison. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) < Epsilon or fabs(A - B) > Epsilon.
V550 An odd precise comparison: x == 0. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) '<' Epsilon. clock_dll sunalgo.cpp 155
void projillum(short* wtab, int xdots, int ydots, double dec)
{
....
s = sin(-dtr(dec));
x = -s * sin(th);
y = cos(th);
....
lon = (y == 0 && x == 0) ? 0.0 : rtd(atan2(y, x));
}
It's strange to expect 'x' and 'y' to exactly equal 0 after all these calculations.
Similar errors can be found in some other places:
V550 An odd precise comparison: x == 0. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) < Epsilon. resample2.cpp 166
static void av_build_filter(....)
{
....
x = M_PI * ((double)(i - center) -
(double)ph / phase_count) * factor;
if (x == 0) y = 1.0;
else y = sin(x) / x;
....
}
It's strange to expect 'x' to exactly equal 0 after all these calculations.
V550 An odd precise comparison: ratio == threshold. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) < Epsilon. Calculator AspectRatioTrigger.cpp 80
void AspectRatioTrigger::UpdateIsActive(Size sourceSize)
{
double numerator, denominator;
....
bool isActive = false;
if (denominator > 0)
{
double ratio = numerator / denominator;
double threshold = abs(Threshold);
isActive = ((ratio > threshold) || (ActiveIfEqual && (ratio == threshold)));
}
SetActive(isActive);
}
Similar errors can be found in some other places: